What It’s Going to Take

“A church is revitalized by the power of God through the Spirit of God at work through the word of God by means of a faithful shepherd of God.”

– Brian Croft, Biblical Church Revitalization: Solutions for Dying & Divided Churches, p. 24


Filed under Christian Unity, Christianity, Church, Prayer, Preaching, Theology

2 responses to “What It’s Going to Take

  1. β€œA church (he means ‘a particular congregation or body of believers in a specific building’) is revitalized by the power of God (there’s nothing we can do) through the Spirit of God (Holy Spirit/Ghost) at work through the word of God (The Bible, The Scriptures, The Good Book, possibly by an emphasis on inerrancy and authority) by means of a faithful shepherd (usually a male pastor, ordained; who meets all qualifications) of God.” (Which seems contradictory that even though we can’t do anything, the Holy Spirit has to use a faithful shepherd to revitalize the church using the Bible.)

    I really can’t stand how these days my first instinct is to decode what Christians mean when they say when they say things. I don’t know what it’s going to take to fix what’s broken about that.

  2. First, it’s not always a bad thing to “decode” people’s language. After all, words mean things. So, I don’t fault you for that.

    Second, however, I would say that a proper “decoding” of the above quote would benefit from reading a little of the book from which the quote came; that might give you a better perspective.

    So, let’s look at how you replied, OK? To begin with, yes, the “church” to which the author (Brian Croft) was referring was, indeed, the local church – a local, autonomous body of believers in an individually unique context. It is biblical to refer to local congregations as “churches” with a small “c.” Many of these churches are in critical need of revitalization.

    Next, when Croft mentions “the power of God,” you say, “there’s nothing we can do.” Why is that? Are you assuming that is what he is implying? Are you implying that what he means is that we men and women are to sit by and do nothing, for only God can do this thing? Surely not. What IS meant by his statement is that church revitalization is nothing that can be done with human initiative or creativity alone, much like making babies; we might do the work, but HE gives life.

    As to the Spirit of God, it should be clear to any well-versed Christian that without the power of the Holy Ghost/Spirit the whole book of Acts couldn’t have been written, much less the Great Commission been carried out. The power (the Spirit) that raised Christ from the dead is the same Spirit that indwells, empowers, and guides the living Church, including the local body of believers. A church that attempts to operate in the flesh alone is like a limb of the body attempting to function without being connected to the source of its life-giving blood.

    The Bible part? Yeah, you pretty much got it. However, in your “decoding” I sensed (rightly or wrongly) some tension with regard to the inerrancy of Scripture. Is that the Methodist in you speaking out? πŸ˜‰

    The “shepherd” of the church part…Is this the anti-complimentarian, egalitarian part of you writing? Sounds like you have a bone to pick with Paul in 1 Timothy and Titus. But as to the meaning of the quote, Croft is referring to the “shepherd” as being the pastor of the church. However, “he” is never used, even though it may be inferred, so even an egalitarian girl preacher could theoretically tack this up on HER church study wall. Therefore, feel free to use it if you’d like πŸ˜‰

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.